Kingdom Leaks & Beyond: Moving Forward

[Summers 16,115]

Release - November 28th, 2019

Genre - Metallic Hardcore

Quality - MP3, 320 kbps CBR

 

Tracklist:

1. Day One
2. Defragmentation
3. Cancerous Breed

 

Download

 

Support!

 iTunes / Bandcamp

 

 

[jimblesack 56]

Scanned these and track 1 and 3 are  256kbps files upsampled or something. Also the "FLAC" of this is only 320kbps and not lossless at all.
I don't get how the band fucked up these conversions when uploading?
 

[Summers 16,115]

4 minutes ago, jimblesack said:

Scanned these and track 1 and 3 are  256kbps files upsampled or something. Also the "FLAC" of this is only 320kbps and not lossless at all.
I don't get how the band fucked up these conversions when uploading?
 

You nitpick too much

[jimblesack 56]

7 hours ago, Summers said:

You nitpick too much

Sorry I want the audio quality of music I like to actually be good
This isn't "nitpicking" either
and this isn't even suggesting anything is your fault lol

[Summers 16,115]

4 minutes ago, jimblesack said:

Sorry I want the audio quality of music I like to actually be good
This isn't "nitpicking" either
and this isn't even suggesting anything is your fault lol

Yeah it is nutpicky this is basically a demo/first release from the band and you are complaining about the quality of it just chill lol

[jimblesack 56]

Just now, Summers said:

Yeah it is nutpicky this is basically a demo/first release from the band and you are complaining about the quality of it just chill lol

It sounds fine (my audio comment was more in general since people seem not understand why these things matter) my problem isn't the production (and I loved this record and this production style). My problem is the files say "320kbps" and it's not, so it's taking up more space than it should and also not accurately represented. If I were to download FLAC files, scan them and it says "actually 320kbps" I'd be pretty annoyed especially if I paid money for it. If it's a lower bitrate then actually say that, not upsample it so it takes up more room and misleads people. It's like on Deezer where all this some upsampled shit somehow makes it on there.

Audio quality as well as not misleading the audience matters, I find it strange the site even points out audio codecs/audio quality but doesn't make scanning files that are uploaded to make sure they are actually what they say they are a requirement.

[suburbanxsatan 1]

8 hours ago, jimblesack said:

Scanned these and track 1 and 3 are  256kbps files upsampled or something. Also the "FLAC" of this is only 320kbps and not lossless at all.
I don't get how the band fucked up these conversions when uploading?
 

What program do you use to scan for this information? I am a quality nerd as well.

 

I'm not sure if this was my upload of the files but if so, then this demo was bought off Google Play. I wonder if it's the same issue coming off bandcamp vs. there. Anyways, does suck if its not 320kbps nitpicking or not but regardless we can all agree this demo is great and so is their first release!

[jimblesack 56]

1 hour ago, suburbanxsatan said:

What program do you use to scan for this information? I am a quality nerd as well.

 

I'm not sure if this was my upload of the files but if so, then this demo was bought off Google Play. I wonder if it's the same issue coming off bandcamp vs. there. Anyways, does suck if its not 320kbps nitpicking or not but regardless we can all agree this demo is great and so is their first release!

This program is Fakin The Funk, costs money but it's affordable and so far the best audio checker I've come across
Free options are Lossless Audio Checker and Spek

Also the files are upsampled on Deezer too, assuming this post was from Bandcamp.